主题：【讨论】流量积算仪瞬时流量的示值误差测量不确定度评定

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
Uncertainty evaluation on errors in displayed values of a transient-flow-rate measurement by Flow Integration Meters

正费了些脑细胞，把这事想了一下，结果竟然已经结贴了。我只好重开新贴。

有几点：
我不建议两个有修饰和被修饰关系的名词放在第三个名词前，那样很容易理解出很多意思；要用，就把词用连字符串起来；
瞬时-用精确的英文说，是“时间依赖的”，我这里用个比较生的TRANSIENT，看上去很快！；也像是画蛇添足；
整个这个所谓评估的逻辑关系。最终是不确定性评估，所以我把它放最前，然后是显示值的误差，BY什么流量计。积分不是Intergration，楼主有点没睡醒。而且，Flow Integration Meters似乎有点不地道。或许积分流量计更好。

最后说一句，我在学习，请别删我的贴。

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
积分不是Intergration

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
瞬时-用精确的英文说，是“时间依赖的”，我这里用个比较生的TRANSIENT

原文由 happyjyl 发表:

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
积分不是Intergration

欢迎讨论！按楼主的意思，“积分”应该如何翻译呢？事实上integrate有积分的意思，很多文献里积分仪就是翻译成integrating instrument或integrator。

原文由 poorlittle 发表:

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
瞬时-用精确的英文说，是“时间依赖的”，我这里用个比较生的TRANSIENT

Because of the widely use of computer, many measurements can be “on-line” and “real time”.  I am not sure whether 瞬时 implies real time measurement as I have no experience in using the flow meter.

I just used “flow meter”, “real time” and/or “transit time” as key words for searching with Google, and found that both “real-time” and “transit-time” were used in the websites regarding flow meters.

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
yes, i agree that real-time cld be a better choice rather than transient which indicates the time span on 10-6 s or even less. on the other hand, "integration" is another trouble maker in the phrase. sucks.

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
积分不是Intergration，楼主有点没睡醒。

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
i also searched on google and found no "flow integration/ing meters" or other similar expression. that is why i think "integration" could be a trouble. anyway, it is the technical point we don't really need to pursue. however, the whole phrase is somewhat hard concerning to the logic.

原文由 poorlittle 发表:

原文由 zhenyihong 发表:
i also searched on google and found no "flow integration/ing meters" or other similar expression. that is why i think "integration" could be a trouble. anyway, it is the technical point we don't really need to pursue. however, the whole phrase is somewhat hard concerning to the logic.

Quoted from Google:
约有1,130,000项符合flow meter, integrating的查询结果
约有429项符合flow meter, integrating-type的查询结果
约有314项符合flow meter, integration-type的查询结果

How about “Uncertainty Evaluation of Error for the Real-time Flow Rate Measured by (an) Integrating-type Flow Meter”
or
“Evaluation of Uncertainty of Error of the Real-time Flow Rate Measured by Integrating-type Flow Meter”. 
The second one seems too many “of”, but I don’t know why, I would prefer the second one.