主题：急求谁有加州65提案原文关于鞋类的要求。

http://proposition65.doj.ca.gov/notice_detail.asp?AGNUMBER=2009-00410&action=notice_detail.asp

英文案例都在这里了

•     Lead in Handbags, Footwear and Belts: Private             Attorney General action against hundreds of retailers and             manufacturers of fashion accessories containing substantial amounts             of lead.  Our work has resulted in Consent Judgments against large             national retailers and vendors of high-lead handbags, belts and             footwear requiring reformulation to remove harmful and unnecessary             levels of lead from these consumer products.  Examples of national             retailers that have agreed to Court ordered reformulation include             Aldo, Calvin Klein, Forever 21, Guess?, J.C. Penney, K-Mart, Kohl's,             Limited, Liz Claiborne, Kate Spade, Macy's, Nine West, Saks, Sears,             Target and Victoria's Secret.

原文由 山石(ivanxie) 发表:
http://proposition65.doj.ca.gov/notice_detail.asp?AGNUMBER=2009-00410&action=notice_detail.asp

英文案例都在这里了

•        Lead in Handbags, Footwear and Belts: Private                        Attorney General action against hundreds of retailers and                        manufacturers of fashion accessories containing substantial amounts                        of lead.  Our work has resulted in Consent Judgments against large                        national retailers and vendors of high-lead handbags, belts and                        footwear requiring reformulation to remove harmful and unnecessary                        levels of lead from these consumer products.  Examples of national                        retailers that have agreed to Court ordered reformulation include                        Aldo, Calvin Klein, Forever 21, Guess?, J.C. Penney, K-Mart, Kohl's,                        Limited, Liz Claiborne, Kate Spade, Macy's, Nine West, Saks, Sears,                        Target and Victoria's Secret.

是要关于鞋类法案的英文噢。请问有吗？

上面的链接就是法案出处了啊， 楼主。法案编号具体如下， 所谓法案其实就是法庭判决的文件， 是不会像标准一样的。

County of Alameda Superior Court, Amended consolidated case RG-09-459448