3，看原文：article33.1: 1. The supplier of a substance or a preparation shall provide the recipient of the substance or preparation with a safety data sheet compiled in accordance with Annex II: (a) where a substance or preparation meets the criteria for classification as dangerous in accordance with Directives 67/548/EEC or 1999/45/EC; or (b) where a substance is persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic or very persistent and very bioaccumulative in accordance with the criteria set out in Annex XIII; or (c) where a substance is included in the list established in accordance with Article 59(1) for reasons other than those referred to in points (a) and (b). 这里面的shall译作必须，也就是说符合下述条件就必须向接受方提供SDS。这是强制性要求。但是显然不能把这句话理解为：假如不符合那些条件，就一定不需要提供SDS。 article33.1: Any supplier of an article containing a substance meeting the criteria in Article 57 and identified in accordance with Article 59(1) in a concentration above 0,1 % weight by weight (w/w) shall provide the recipient of the article with sufficient information, available to the supplier, to allow safe use of the article including, as a minimum, the name of that substance. 这里的理解同上，也就是如果SVHC超过0.1%就必须给客户传递信息，但依然不能理解为不超0.1%就不用传递。如果是这样，那我产品如果评估的结果小于0.1%的话，那我是不是可以不理客户的调查？ 所以法规中其实都只是规定了强制提交SDS和强制传递信息的条件，而并没有规定无需提交SDS和无需传递信息的条件。
我的社区
签到
赛默飞实验室产品焕新计划有奖调研！
【七月征文】不一YOUNG实验“猿”
报名开启：ICS2024第十三届光谱网络会议！
推荐收藏！盘点中药材及饮片检测解决方案
