主题:【原创】哪位好心人有微波消解英文文献的中文翻译啊??

浏览0 回复8 电梯直达
cinndy
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
哪位好心人帮忙翻译下啊??
关于微波消解的英文文献内容
为您推荐
您可能想找: 微波消解仪 询底价
专属顾问快速对接
立即提交
ronghui
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
你要看是什么方法,我知道有一个你可以在资料库中找到一个是EPA3052的方法,是对微波消解的!
无名
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 cinndy 发表:
哪位好心人帮忙翻译下啊??



两个问题:
1,所求助文献为什么文献的翻译,是不是同时提供文献咱们才能进行讨论
2,如果只是方法,建议事先到相应标准版面进行检索
cinndy
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
cinndy
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
atlas
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
cinndy
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
cinndy
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 ronghui 发表:
你要看是什么方法,我知道有一个你可以在资料库中找到一个是EPA3052的方法,是对微波消解的!

请问那个epa是中文的还是英文的呀?毕业论文要翻译英文的,我要做两个大论文时间来不及了……~~~~(>_<)~~~~
czq8
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
论文题目是:

Comparison of three optimized digestion methods for rapid determination of chemical oxygen demand: Closed microwaves, open microwaves and ultrasound irradiation


Claudia E. Dominib, Montserrat Hidalgoa, Frank Markenc, Antonio Canalsa,∗
a Departamento de Qu´ımica Anal´ıtica, Nutrición y Bromatolog´ıa, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain
b Departamento de Qu´ımica, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Av. Alem 1253, 8000 Bah´ıa Blanca, Argentina
c Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY , UK

Received 21 October 2005; received in revised form 10 January 2006; accepted 10 January 2006



摘要:


Abstract

In the present work, experimental design was used for the fast optimization of three kinds of sample digestion procedures with the final aim of obtaining the COD value of wastewater samples. The digestion methods evaluated were “closed microwave-assisted” (CMWD), “open microwave-assisted” (OMWD) and “ultrasound-assisted” (USD). Classical digestion was used as reference method. The optimum values for the different variables studied in each method were: 90 psi pressure, 475W power and 4min irradiation time (CMWD); 150 ◦C temperature and 4 min irradiation time (OMWD); 90% of maximum nominal power (180W), 0.9 s(s −1)cycles and 1 min irradiation time (USD). In all cases, interference concentration that produces a deviation of 10% in COD values is 13.4, 23.4, 21.1 and 2819 mg/L for S 2−, Fe2+,NO2− and Cl−, respectively. Under optimum conditions, the proposed digestion methods have been successfully applied, with the exception of pyridine, to several pure organ compounds and COD recoveries for 10 real wastewater samples were ranged between 88 and 104% of the values obtained with the classical (op reflux) method used as reference, with R.S.D. lower than 4% in most cases. Thus, the use of ultrasound energy for COD determination seems be an interesting and promising alternative to conventional open reflux and microwave-assisted digestion methods used for the same purpose sin the instrumentation is simpler, cheaper and safer and the digestion step faster than the ones used for the same purpose.

© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: COD determination; Ultrasound energy; Microwave radiation; Optimization; Experimental design




给你识别出来,不一定都正确,自己参考吧


Comparison of three optimized digestion methods for rapid determination of chemical oxygen demand: Closed microwaves, open microwaves and ultrasound irradiation
猜你喜欢最新推荐热门推荐更多推荐
品牌合作伙伴