主题:【求助】Please who can help explain the contrast difference in these two images?

浏览0 回复4 电梯直达
alcestis
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
Sorry not be able to type Chinese on this computer!
Attached are two ADF images, image 1 is taken at higher collection angle than image 2, so i would expect diffraction contrast in image 2, and mostly Z contrast in image 1. You can notice that there are areas (arrowed in the images) that appear dark in image 1 but bright in image 2. Initially, I thought the bright area in image 1 indicates a heavier material, but actually both brighter and darker areas in image 1 has the same composition suggested by EDX. So I am confused why I see the contrast in image 1 for same material? if it is still a diffraction contrast, then why it is reversed compared to that in image 2?
Anybody has some idea about this? Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Thank you!
Image 1:
image1
Image 2:
image 2
为您推荐
您可能想找: 气相色谱仪(GC) 询底价
专属顾问快速对接
立即提交
可能感兴趣
m3033883
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
由于在不同的角度收集信号。可能该区的强衍射正好落在你收集的范围内。例如图1的亮区。当换到图2时,这些衍射就不在收集的范围内,该区就变暗了。基本原理估计就是这样。个人意见,仅供参考。
Jin
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
alcestis
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
谢谢楼上两位回复。我的问题是什么散射信号会在低角的STEM 暗场图像上是暗的,而在较高角的暗场图像上是亮的。已经排除不是化学成分不同引起。按照Jin的建议,如果图一亮区是因为靠近晶带轴,那么在图二也应该会亮,因为图二的scattering angle更低,基本就是衍射衬度。
洪星二锅头
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
可能是局部应力造成的衍射衬度,做一下暗场应该就能区分了
猜你喜欢最新推荐热门推荐更多推荐
品牌合作伙伴