主题:【哀悼+怀念】遗传学家谈家桢院士今晨逝世 享年100岁

浏览0 回复32 电梯直达
可能感兴趣
神相布衣
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
2003年,美国遗传学会撰文——

谈家桢,大起大落的传奇人生
(C. C. Tan: A Life of Peaks and Valleys)


Copyright . 2003 by the Genetics Society of America
Perspectives

Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics
Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove


C. C. Tan: A Life of Peaks and Valleys
James F. Crow


Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

I First met C. C. Tan (Tan Jiazhen) in 1946 at the University of Texas in Austin where I was visiting at the time. He was there to give a seminar on “mosaic dominance” in ladybird (aka ladybug) beetles. I was particularly interested because of the similarity to the patternexpressionof scute allelesin Drosophilamelanogas-ter and was eager to talk to him about this and about his D. pseudoobscura work with Dobzhansky and Sturte-vant. So we arranged to have dinner together. We went by trolley to a Chinese restaurant, Sam Wah’s, which I believe was the only one in Austin. He suggested that he order the food, since by speaking in the native lan-guage he could get us more authentic Chinese dishes. Alas, the waiter did not speak Chinese; his ancestors had emigrated several generations earlier. He sum-monedthecook,whoitturnedoutdidn’tspeakChinese either, nor English for that matter. I ended up ordering the food. A little over half a century later, Tan and I met again, this time in China. Of course he recalled the incident, and we relived an amusing episode. A lot had happened in the meantime, especially to him.

The pigment pattern of the ladybird elytra (hard wing covers, singular elytron) is remarkably polymorphic; dif-ferent geographical regions show characteristic pattern frequencies (Tan 1946a). More than 200 forms had been identi.ed by 1946. The differences in various geo-graphical regions are so striking that classical entomolo-gists had often classi.ed them as separate species, even separate genera. Tan found that the entire range of patterns could be explained by variation at a single autosomal locus with 12 alleles. Hoshino (1940) had studied three additional alleles not found in the regions Tan studied, which .t into the explanation, so there were 15 alleles altogether and undoubtedly more to be discovered.

One allele, s (for succinea), is recessive to the others. It produces a background orange-yellow color, which may or may not have a number of dark spots. The location of spots is very speci.c; they may occur at any of 10 sites. The penetrance of s is variable, as is the size of the spots if they do occur. The penetrance and size of spots are greater at lower developmental temperatures.

The other 11 alleles produce a much larger amount ofblackpigment,whichmaycoveralmostalltheelytron, and the location of the black pigment is constant for a particular allele. Each of these alleles is dominant to s, and each acts independently of the others. Thus, heterozygotes for two different dominant alleles are black in all areas that would be black in either of the two constituent homozygotes. Tan (1946a) called this mosaic dominance. The yellow areas are conditioned by the s allele. They may or not show small spots, de-pending strongly on the developmental temperature.

When the beetle emerges from the pupa, the entire elytronisyellow.Theblackpigmentthenappearsgradu-ally, starting at the edges. The sharp delineation of the pigmented areas, the independence of the individual alleles, the timing of the developmental pattern, and the effect of temperature made this promising material for the study of developmental patterns, and the work attracted a great deal of attention at the time. One hypothesis, introduced by Dubinin and Serebrovsky (Dubinin 1933) to explain mosaic dominance of the scute and achaete alleles in Drosophila, was called “step allelomorphism.” The idea was that the bristle patterns re.ected subdivisions of the gene. But the sub-gene hypothesis created more problems than it solved (Stur-tevant and Schultz 1931), so most of the discussion at the time concerned developmental patterns rather than domains within genes.
神相布衣
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
C. C. Tan was born in Zhejiang Province in China in 1909 and did his undergraduate work at Soochow University. (Soochow was known as “the Chinese Ven-ice.”) Tan then did graduate work at Yenching Univer-sity in Peking where two of the faculty, Ju Chi Li and T. Y. Chen, had been students in T. H. Morgan’s labora-tory at Columbia University. Li carried out several cyto-logical and genetic studies while in the Morgan lab (e.g., Bridges et al. 1936). Also, he had played football at Purdue University. I visited him in his of.ce in Beijing when he was nearly 90. He was still large and robust, regularly rode a bicycle to work, and was eager to talk about either genetics or athletics. He became Tan’s mentor for research on ladybird beetles, which led to a master’s thesis. Li was so pleased with this work that he sent the resulting paper to Morgan, who by this time had moved to CalTech in Pasadena. Fortuitously, Dobzhansky had worked with ladybirds in Russia, so Morgan naturally passed the manuscript on to him. Dobzhanskythoughthighlyofit,andaftersomerevision and editing by the Morgan group, the paper was pub-lished in the United States (Tan and Li 1934).

On Dobzhansky’s recommendation, Morgan invited Tan to CalTech for Ph.D. work. He arrived in 1934 and immediately began work with Dobzhansky and Sturte-vant, becoming Dobzhansky’s .rst Ph.D. student. The enormous power of giant salivary chromosomes of Dro-sophila had recently become apparent, and Tan was assigned the task of making a cytological map of the chromosomes of D. pseudoobscura. He quickly became an expert and soon found that races A and B, as they were then called, differed by a large number of easily recognizedinversions.(AandBarenowcalled D.pseudo-obscura and D. persimilis.) The inversions were so charac-teristic that they could be used as identifying markers for the two species, which are almost indistinguishable by external morphology (Tan 1935). Tan’s work grabbed the enthusiastic attention of Sturtevant and Dobzhan-sky, and they began immediately to study the geographi-cal distribution of the various inversion types. This marked the exciting beginning of the great Sturtevant– Dobzhansky collaboration, which continued until grad-ually the two had a falling out and Dobzhansky moved toColumbiaUniversity.(Forspeculationastothecauses of the rift, see Provine 1981.) One notable result of this work was the use of overlapping inversions to infer the phylogeny of the different chromosome types. Tan also pioneered in studying the genetic basis of sexual isolation (Dobzhansky and Tan 1936; Tan 1946b). This work, and much more, was summarized in Dobz-hansky’s (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species, which became an instant classic. I vividly recall my excitement as a graduate student on .rst reading this book in early 1938. I thought it was the greatest thing since Darwin.

Among the discoveries at the time was a new species, Drosophila miranda (Dobzhansky and Tan 1936). For one thing, this species had a number of chromosomal inversions,includingthoseofahypotheticalformances-tral to or intermediate between a series of pseudoobscura and persimilis inversion classes. Tan estimated that at least49chromosomebreakswererequiredtoexplainall the differences between miranda and the others. More interesting, as a result of a translocation, an autosomal arm split off and was inherited solely in males. Thus, it behaved like a Y chromosome. This neo-Y, because of the absence of recombination in Drosophila males, was expected to degenerate. There was much speculation at the time as to why and how rapidly such degeneration would occur, but the kind of detailed analysis that can provide answers has been possible only recently (e.g., Bachtrog and Charlesworth 2002).

Tan continued to collaborate on evolutionary studies withSturtevantandDobzhansky(Dobzhansky and Tan 1936; Sturtevant and Tan 1937) and on develop-mental subjects with others (Tan and Poulson 1937; Gottschewski and Tan 1938). He was highly produc-tive during his time in the United States, and he contin-ued this on his return to China. In 1937 he joined the faculty of Chekiang University, which, because of the Japanese incursions, had been moved to a southwestern locale in Kweichow. During that time, Tan had support from the Rockefeller Foundation. Although he contin-ued some Drosophila studies, his main emphasis re-turned to ladybird beetles. In addition to his work on mosaic dominance, he and his students performed large-scale studiesontheracialvariationandpopulation structure.ThiswasanexcitingperiodforChinesegenet-icsandforTan,whobythistimehadaworldwidereputa-tion. He also monitored a number of students. Among them was T. C. Hsu, later to become famous for his happy discovery that treatment with a hypotonic salt solution makes individual human chromosomes much more distinct. This .nding was important in ushering in the renaissance of human cytology, which .ourished in the late 1950s. The Rockefeller Foundation also sup-ported Tan for a return to the United States to consoli-date his studies and write them up for publication (Tan 1946a,b). It was during this period that I saw him in Texas.

Returning to China in 1946, he made another trip abroad, in 1948. He was a member of the standing council of the 8th International Congress of Genetics, which met that year in Sweden. Alas, the Lysenko deba-cle in the Soviet world was taking hold in China. For the next 3 decades, Tan’s life was one of political upheaval, intellectual uncertainty, and personal hardship, mixed with shorter periods in which things went somewhat better. At no time, however, was he able to pursue the research he was really interested in.

During this period in China, orthodox geneticists were forced to conform to Lysenko’s Lamarckian views or else switch to another .eld. Maize geneticists told me of being sent to grow maize in cold climates, where the short growing season was totally unsuited. Not only were these workers predictably unsuccessful, they en-dured various hardships including malnutrition. Tan stopped teaching genetics and concentrated on evolu-tion. He escaped political dif.culties by emphasizing paleontology and the evidence of evolution, rather than mechanisms. Of course, the ladybird and Drosophila population studies had to be dropped; they were not “practical” enough.
神相布衣
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
Among the Mendelists was the population geneticist, C. C. Li, who had a growing reputation as a teacher and textbook writer. Several Chinese geneticists, whom I saw years later, remembered him and extolled his great skill as a teacher. His widely in.uential book (Li 1948) was beginning to catch on, both inside and outside China.

But life was not good, and he was under great social pressure to conform. His wife, who had lived in the United States, was particularly unhappy. The Li family eventually contrived, despite hardships, to get out of China through Hong Kong. [As a poignant aside, I note that Li’s book was dedicated “to Jeff.” I often wondered who Jeff was. Later I learned (Spiess 1983): Jeffrey was an infant son who died during the hardships of the Li family’s last days in China.]

In the United States, largely through the in.uence of H. J. Muller, Li accepted a position at the University of Pittsburgh, where he has been ever since—a decision neither he nor Pittsburgh has reason to regret. His repu-tation as a teacher continued to grow throughout the world. His book quickly became popular in the United States and went through several editions. He is held in great admiration and affection, and recently celebrated his 90th birthday.
During the period from about 1958 to 1966, the Ly-senkoist and Mendelian views of genetics were permit-ted to coexist. That must have been terribly confusing for students. “Practical” research was permitted, and Tan wrote several papers on the effects of high-energy radiation on the chromosomes of the rhesus monkey.

Tan described an incident from that time, which is revealing and also wryly amusing. An experimenter had treated cotton with a vital dye and reported inherited effects of the treatment in the next generation. Tan was sent to investigate and later discovered that a paper reporting these results had been submitted with his name attached. He adroitly explained, however, that he had tried to learn the techniques but had been unsuc-cessful. Since he had not adequately mastered the tech-niques, he did not deserve to be an author. So his name was removed, and his reputation among Mendelian ge-neticists was thereby preserved.

Then another blow fell. The period 1966–1976 was the time of the Cultural Revolution, “ten long years.” Again, these were hard times, and Tan published almost nothingduringthatperiod.Furthermore,helostalmost all contact with his colleagues abroad. Finally, in 1978 he was able to leave China and attend the 50th anniver-sary of the founding of CalTech’s Biology Division in Pasadena.

At last, in 1979 at the age of 70 when most people are retired, he was able again to do genetic research. Once more, he took up his study of ladybird beetles, .nding more alleles and obtaining more population data. But this was no longer center stage. The molecular revolution had occurred during the eclipse of Chinese genetics,andgeneticswasgoinginnewdirections.Char-acteristically, Tan immediately became the leader. He was active in the search for harmful environmental chemicals, advocating the Ames system for testing possi-ble mutagens and carcinogens. He was alert to molecu-lar techniques and wrote about RNA ampli.cation in heterosis. He wrote a number of essays and review arti-cles on various aspects of genetics and evolution and the changes brought about by technical advances. He was an early advocate of the construction of a human genome library. He directed various studies on rice. He used mitochondrial DNA to study human variability. And much more. In his 70 years of teaching and re-search, despite the long interruptions, he has published more than 100 scienti.c papers—original research, re-views, translations, and essays. His overview of Chinese genetics (Fu et al. 1995) is a concise summary of a long history.

As early as 1952, Tan had moved to Shanghai to be-come Professor and Chairman of the Biology Depart-ment at Fudan University. He has remained there since, holding various high administrative positions. Now re-tired, he is honorary director of the Genetics Institute at that university.
In the 1980s and 90s the world of genetics in China made up for its neglect of Tan. He was showered with richly deserved honors. These are too numerous to list, but I shall mention a few. He was president of the Genet-ics Society of China, the Environmental Mutagens Soci-ety of China, and the Biotechnology Society of China. He was an of.cer, usually vice president, of the Interna-tional Genetics Congress in 1948, 1983, 1988, and 1993. Finally, he was the major proponent and then president of the 18th International Congress, held in Beijing in 1998. Among his foreign honors are a distinguished alumni award from the California Institute of Technol-ogy, foreign membership in the United States National Academy of Sciences, foreign membership in the Japa-nese and British Genetics Societies, and honorary life member of the New York Academy of Sciences. Finally, in 1999 he received a unique honor: a planet was named after him, Planet Number 3542, discovered at an obser-vatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. What other geneticist can claim this?

Tan’s volume, The Selected Works of Tan Jaizhen (Tan 1992), is a trove of interesting items, especially for those who can read Chinese. But pictures are the same in any language, and the book has some 45 pages of them, mostly in color, showing the gregarious Tan at various times of his life, along with almost a Who’s Who of geneti-cists that he met during his travels. The pictures repre-sent two periods, with large gaps caused by Lysenkoism and the Cultural Revolution. The book is composed of a summary and sometimes the entire text of some 80 papers. The majority of the articles are in Chinese, but enough are in English to satisfy the language chal-lenged. Included is a heart-warming tribute to his men-tor, Dobzhansky, whom Tan never saw after 1948. This bookisawonderfulwaytoseethebreadthofhisinterest. Now, well into his nineties, he can look back on a career that has had far higher peaks and deeper valleys than most geneticists can claim. Despite hardships and set-backs, he has had a rich life. He has lived by his intellect and personality, and by his wits, both scienti.cally and politically. The Selected Works of Tan Jaizhen shows the fruits.

I am indebted to Joshua Lederberg and Rayla Temin for reading the manuscript and offering useful suggestions.

liu999999
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
家有宝贝儿
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
yuduoling
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
汾阳王
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
阳线
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
lr2008_ongi
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
天字一号猪
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
猜你喜欢最新推荐热门推荐更多推荐
品牌合作伙伴