主题：请问这句话怎么翻译？

原文由 下里巴人 发表:
it is also worth noting that improvement in the calibration procedure can be brought about by measures that are significantly simpler than those required for umproving the SPE.

umproving the SPE里的umproving是不是打错了？应该是improving吧？

我是这么理解的（如果句子最末是improving the SPE的话）：
可以用比改进SPE简单得多的方法来改进校准程序，但这同样毫无意义。

原文意思可能是这样的：需要在现有设备或方法的基础上得到一个更好的结果，于是提出两种方案：改进固相萃取（设备），或改进校准程序。改进固相萃取（设备）较困难，也没有意义；相比之下改进校准程序就简单多了，但同样没有价值。

没有上下文，意思很难猜，希望楼主把上下文贴出来！以后发帖提问的朋友也请注意：一定要把上下文贴出来，大家才能更好地帮助你。

原文由 下里巴人 发表:
it is also worth noting that improvement in the calibration procedure can be brought about by measures that are significantly simpler than those required for umproving the SPE.

试着翻译了一下：
值得注意的是，测量可导致校准过程中的改进，而且改善测量要比改善SPE简单多了

原文由 下里巴人 发表:
it is also worth noting that improvement in the calibration procedure can be brought about by measures that are significantly simpler than those required for umproving the SPE.

我的理解：（umproving假如应该是improving的话）
同样值得注意的是，通过比改进SPE简单得多的方法即可实现对校准程序的改进。

意思上我也觉得应该是改进SPE和改进校准程序都是有价值的，但不知为何句子开头是It is also worth nothing？

原文由 下里巴人 发表:
it is also worth noting that improvement in the calibration procedure can be brought about by measures that are significantly simpler than those required for improving the SPE.

相比于SPE方法的改进需求来说，通过测量来进行校准程序的改进要简单得多，但这仍然没有什么价值。

原文由 happyjyl 发表:
意思上我也觉得应该是改进SPE和改进校准程序都是有价值的，但不知为何句子开头是It is also worth nothing？

我觉得这是又一个笔误，应该是worth noting

原文不就是noting吗？我看楼主也没有修改过，难道浏览器出问题了？

这个我搞错了，happy的回复我没看仔细，没有对照原文看

The quantitation was done by a calibration
curve. The recovery was 87G4% for three assays, whereas repeatability
of 10 replicate measurements was only 1 to 2%. A detailed error
analysis [3] showed that 75% of the uncertainty came from the SPE step and
the rest came from the analytical procedure. Of the latter, 24% was attributed
to uncertainty in the calibration, and the remaining 1% came from the
variation in serum volume. It is also worth noting that improvement in the
calibration procedure can be brought about by measures that are significantly
simpler than those required for improving the SPE. The variability in
SPE can come from the cartridge itself, the washing, the extraction, the
drying, or the redissolution steps. There are too many variables to control.


这是上下文，不好意思，刚才弄忘记了，给各位添麻烦了

好象是固相微萃取的校正问题