Reckless driving——鲁莽驾驶
Reckless driving is a mental state in which the driver of an automobile behaves recklessly; the driver often misjudges common driving procedures, intentionally causing accidents and other damages.
Reckless driving, in the United States, is a serious moving traffic violation. As an offense reckless driving is variously described by different U.S. state statutes. It is usually a more serious offense than careless driving and is often punishable by fines, imprisonment, and/or driver's license suspension or revocation.
【注】 鲁莽驾驶,有别于不小心驾驶(careless driving),鲁莽驾驶的情况比较严重,包括伤人及损毁财物、牲畜等,刑罚比不小心驾驶重。
Restraint of trade——竞业限制、限制从业
Restraint of trade is a restriction on a person's freedom to conduct business in a specified or unspecified location for a specified or unspecified length of time. Such restrictions are normally enacted by contracts. Generally however, such contracts are void on the ground of illegality, and cannot be enforceable unless they are reasonable in the interests of both contracting parties and of the public at large. Contracts between employer and employee and contracts for the sale of businesses which include terms restrictive of free business conduct are subject to this rule.
【注】 Restraint of trade(竞业限制),主要出现在雇佣关系上。很多时候,雇主会在雇佣合约上加上条款,限制雇员在离职以后,往别处地方工作或限制雇员在某特定时间内为其它雇主工作。这些限制有可能因地域或时间长短等而被法庭裁定无效。
Royal Assent——御准、王室同意
The granting of Royal Assent is the formal method by which a constitutional monarch completes the legislative process of lawmaking by formally assenting to an Act of Parliament. While the power to withhold Royal Assent was once exercised often, it has not been employed in a modern, democratic political atmosphere since the 18th century. The power remains as one of the reserve powers of the monarch.
【注】 在英国,经下议院、上议院一致同意(或者依照法律可以不经上议院同意)的议案呈交君主御准(Royal Assent),君主给予正式的同意,议案因此成为法案。御准日期(Date of Royal Assent)及君主同意议案成为法案的日期。它与该法的生效日期不同。
根据1707年以来确立的惯例,君主从不拒绝批准一份已经由议会两院通过的议案。1707年安妮女王拒绝批准一项议案,这也是英国君主最后一次拒绝批准议案。
Sources of law——法律渊源
Sources of law are the materials and processes out of which law is developed. The basic sources of law include the Constitution, statutes, and caselaw. The natural law theory argues that some rules objectively existing in the nature also are source of law, while legal positivism argues that only the rules made by sovereignty can be the sources of law.
【注】 Sources of law(法律渊源),没有一个确定的定义,其含义在各个法律制度下也不尽相同。
(1)美国学者玛丽·格林顿等认为,“法律渊源涉及的问题,不是普通市民如何看待其行为如何受到管辖,而是法院从何处寻找可以用以解决具体争议的法律规则。”(玛丽·格林顿等《比较法律传统(第二版)》)
(2)英国学者S. B. Marsh和J. Soulsby认为,法律渊源至少是指两种不同的事物,其一是指法律产生的历史源头,如普通法和衡平法;其二是指法院在判决案件时所诉诸的规则域系(body of rules)以及在哪里能够找到这些规则,当今最主要的是先例和立法。(S. B. Marsh and J. Soulsby, Outlines of English Law (4th ed.), McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1987, p10)
(3)J. Myron Hacobstein和Roy M. Mersky认为法律渊源一词包括三个不同的概念:第一是指法律概念和观念(conceptions and ideas)的源头;第二是指制定法律规则的政府机构;第三是指经公布的各种法律的宣示媒介,如书籍、数据库、胶卷微片、光盘等。(J. Myron Hacobsteinand Roy M. Mersky, Fundamentals of Legal Research, 5th ed. 1990)
(4)Thomas E. Holland认为法律渊源一词具有四种含义:第一是文献渊源(literary source),即人们从中获得法律知识的地方,如制定法汇编、判例汇编或专著;第二是正式渊源(formal source),即支撑法律的最高权力,如国家;第三是历史或材料渊源(historical or material sources),即导致(通常是自动地)后来获得法律效力的规则产生的原因,如习惯、宗教及科学论争等;第四是效力渊源(legal source),即国家用以认可先前没有法律效力的规则或用以制定新法律的机关,如立法或裁判机构。(Bryan A. Garner, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, 1995, pp819—820)
Trespass——侵越、非法侵扰
To commit an unlawful injury to the person, property, or rights of another, with actual or implied force or violence, especially to enter onto another's land wrongfully.
【注】 Trespass(侵越、非法侵扰),即若没有任何批准而擅自进入别人的地方。若用之于个人身上,可以指非法禁锢或殴打他人的行为。