主题:【讨论】强迫降解测试

浏览0 回复17 电梯直达
ghost555
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
As for those active substances described in official pharmacopoeia monograph,stress testing is mandatory or not ?

according to CPMP/QWP/122/02,rev corr:
If there are named under "purity test" and/or "section on impurities", and the active substances completely meets the requirements of Pharmacopoeia, then no stress testing is needed.

therefore, I think, for those active substances with purity test or impurities itmes described in pharmocopoeia, in my idea, it's unnecessary to conduct such study.right or not? But why so many customers ask for those data? thanks in advance.

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

original text is attached below: stability testing of existing active substances

//2.1.2 Stress testing

For an active substance the following approacehs may be used:
a) When an active substance is described in an official pharmacopoeia monograph and fully meets its requirements no dat are required on the degradaiton products if they are named under the headings "purity test" and/or "section on impurities".//
该帖子作者被版主 何当奇4积分, 2经验,加分理由:积极讨论
为您推荐
您可能想找: 气相色谱仪(GC) 询底价
专属顾问快速对接
立即提交
可能感兴趣
闲鹤野云
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
何当奇
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 ghost555 发表:
As for those active substances described in official pharmacopoeia monograph,stress testing is mandatory or not ?
官方药典中所述有效成分,是否需要进行压力测试?

according to CPMP/QWP/122/02,rev corr:
rev corr什么意思?
If there are named under "purity test" and/or "section on impurities", and the active substances completely meets the requirements of Pharmacopoeia, then no stress testing is needed.

therefore, I think, for those active substances with purity test or impurities itmes described in pharmocopoeia, in my idea, it's unnecessary to conduct such study.right or not? But why so many customers ask for those data? thanks in advance.
ghost555
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
stress testing 是指forced degradation studies

rev corr 是指revision corrected.
poorlittle
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
corr 是否有可能是 corrigendum  (勘误表) ?

晚上回家後在网上搜了一下, corr 多指 correction, corrected
该帖子作者被版主 redanqi2积分, 2经验,加分理由:参与讨论
赞贴
0
收藏
0
拍砖
0
Last edit by poorlittle
何当奇
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 ghost555 发表:
stress testing 是指forced degradation studies

rev corr 是指revision corrected.

不好意思,没有见过这个forced degradation studies的相关知识,想知道这个跟压力测试有没有什么关系?
happyjyl
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 redanqi 发表:
原文由 ghost555 发表:
stress testing 是指forced degradation studies

rev corr 是指revision corrected.

不好意思,没有见过这个forced degradation studies的相关知识,想知道这个跟压力测试有没有什么关系?


跟压力测试没关系。forced degradation studies是药物的强制降解试验,即在强酸、强碱、氧化、强光、高温等条件下对药物进行破坏,迫使其降解产生有关物质。
该帖子作者被版主 redanqi5积分, 2经验,加分理由:应助
happyjyl
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 poorlittle 发表:
corr 是否有可能是 corrigendum  (勘误表) ?


这里的rev corr是指revision correction。

revision的来历:CPMP/QWP/122/02的前身是CPMP/QWP/556/96,在2002年12月进行了修订,整合了CPMP/ICH/421/02、CPMP/ICH/2736/99 corr和CPMP/ICH/2287/99的部分内容,给出了新的编号CPMP/QWP/122/02。

correction的来历:在2003年1月对CPMP/QWP/122/02中长期稳定性研究的时间做了修订。跟revision比起来属于小的调整。



happyjyl
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
according to CPMP/QWP/122/02,rev corr:
If there are named under "purity test" and/or "section on impurities", and the active substances completely meets the requirements of Pharmacopoeia, then no stress testing is needed.

这是原文还是你的理解?跟我印象中有出入。我这几天不在办公室,你把原文贴出来再说。(PS.至少要整段话的原文,不是其中的某一句。也不要删减。)明天会很晚回家,后天再答复你。
何当奇
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵

跟压力测试没关系。forced degradation studies是药物的强制降解试验,即在强酸、强碱、氧化、强光、高温等条件下对药物进行破坏,迫使其降解产生有关物质。
哦,谢谢
因为我以前在别的地方见到过有压力测试,没想到医药还是很特殊
happyjyl
结帖率:
100%
关注:0 |粉丝:0
新手级: 新兵
原文由 ghost555 发表:
a) When an active substance is described in an official pharmacopoeia monograph and fully meets its requirements no data are required on the degradaiton products if they are named under the headings "purity test" and/or "section on impurities".


嗯,跟我印象中是一致的。上面只说对于药典中“纯度检验”或“杂质”项下有规定的降解产物,可以不提供其强制降解试验的数据;而没说可以不做强制降解试验。原料药一般都要做强制降解试验的,目的有两个:一是揭示稳定性、降解途径和降解产物,二是验证有关物质检测方法的专属性。对于已收载于药典的仿制药,强制降解试验主要用于以上第二点。

猜你喜欢最新推荐热门推荐更多推荐
品牌合作伙伴