原文由 ruojun 发表:
好像是法院公告中关于诉讼的表达。某人原告状告雅马哈公司所有一干人等....
也有使用and others而不是does1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE的
应是“一干人等”
A pending lawsuit is typically the basis for obtaining court-authorized discovery. Thus, a preliminary step to receiving court authorization is to file a valid complaint in court. If a federal claim is made, such complaints may be filed in federal court. Since the identity of the defendant is unknown, the defendant is typically listed as "John Doe" or "Jane Doe." Indeed, such cases are sometimes known as "John Doe" lawsuits. (In cases where there appears to be
multiple defendants, they are listed as, for instance, "John
Does 1-150.")
http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2212